29 May 2012

Housing Market Recovering

Story first appeared in The Wall Street Journal.

Sales of previously owned homes rose at a robust clip in April—and prices jumped—the latest indications that the hard-hit housing market is recovering.

Existing-home sales were up 3.4% from March to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.62 million, the National Association of Realtors trade group said Tuesday. If the pace holds, 2012 could be the strongest year for home sales since 2007, just after the housing boom. The median home price, meanwhile, increased 10.1% from a year earlier to $177,400, the strongest year-to-year gain since January 2006.

Economists said the higher median price reflects rising values and a shift toward fewer sales of foreclosed homes.

The higher sales are further confirmation that the industry is experiencing the best spring selling season since 2010, when home-buyer tax credits boosted demand. Sales improved partly thanks to strong demand from investors, who have been active buyers of distressed properties which they hope to sell at a profit. But they were also helped by traditional buyers who are feeling more confident about the economy and are ready to take advantage of low interest rates and bargain prices.

While prices are starting to rise, they remain significantly lower than a few years ago. Last week, Freddie Mac said average rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages dropped to 3.79% for the week ending May 16. In 2005, at the height of the housing boom, some 30-year rates topped 6%.

Tuesday's report held signs that conditions in the housing market are inching closer to normal: Foreclosures and other distressed properties, which sell at steep discounts and have dragged down prices in recent years, accounted for 28% of April's sales—down slightly from March and a steep drop from 37% a year earlier. First-time buyers, who have struggled with tightened lending standards in recent months, made up 35% of April's purchasers, up from 33% in March and down slightly from a year earlier.

Inventories remain lean, though they are expanding. The inventory of homes for sale increased 9.5% from March to 2.54 million at the end of April, indicating more sellers feel comfortable enough to list their homes. That represented a 6.6-month supply, a level considered healthy by economists.

But it appears to be getting harder to find big bargains. Sales of homes under $100,000 fell more than 25% from a year earlier in the foreclosure-heavy West. Nationwide, homes priced between $250,000 and $500,000 were up 21.2% from a year earlier.

Still, real-estate agents say the housing recovery could easily stall if inventory swells—for instance as banks seek to unload more foreclosed properties—if interest rates rise, or if the economy stumbles.


For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

16 May 2012

Homebuilding Goes Up

Story first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.

U.S. builders began work on more homes last month, evidence that the battered housing market is slowly healing.

The Commerce Department said Wednesday that builders broke ground at a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 717,000 homes in April from March. That's 2.6 percent more than March's total, which was revised higher. Construction rose for both single-family homes and apartments.

Building permits, a gauge of future construction, fell last month from a 3 1 / 2 year high to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 715,000. But that was because of a 23 percent drop in the volatile apartment category. Permits for single-family homes rose almost 2 percent.

Even with the gains, the rate of construction and the level of permits requested remain roughly half the pace considered healthy. But the increase, along with rising builder confidence and stronger job growth, is a hopeful sign that the home market may finally be starting to recover nearly five years after the housing bubble burst.

Builders have grown more confident since last fall, in part because more people have expressed interest in buying a home. In May, builder optimism rose to the highest level in five years, according to the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo builder sentiment index.

Construction Project Management teams for homebuilders have reported improving sales and higher traffic from prospective buyers, the survey showed. A gauge measuring confidence in sales over the next six months also rose to 34 from 31.

Recent job gains have likely made it easier for more Americans to purchase a home. Employers have added 1 million jobs in the past five months. And unemployment has dropped a full percentage point since August, from 9.1 percent to 8.1 percent in April.

Mortgage rates, meanwhile, have fallen to record lows, making home-buying more affordable. Still, many would-be buyers are having difficulty qualifying for home loans or can't afford larger down payments required by banks.

Though new homes represent just 20 percent of the overall home market, they have an outsize impact on the economy. Each home built creates an average of three jobs for a year and generates about $90,000 in taxes, according to the National Association of Home Builders.

There are some hurdles to a smooth recovery: Builders are struggling to compete with deeply discounted foreclosures and short sales — when lenders allow homes to be sold for less than what's owed on the mortgage.

Another reason sales have fallen is that previously occupied homes have become a better deal than new homes. The median price of a new home is about 30 percent higher than the median price for a re-sale. That's nearly twice the markup typical in a healthy housing market.

Another report found that U.S. factory output increased in April, helped by a gain in auto production. Busier factories have driven stronger hiring this year and helped the economy grow.

The Federal Reserve says factory production rose 0.6 percent in April, erasing a 0.5 percent decline in March.

Half of the April increase reflected a 3.9 percent jump in the production of motor vehicles and parts. That's the fifth consecutive gain at auto plants and the biggest rise since January.

Overall industrial production increased 1.1 percent in April. In addition to the big gain at factories, output at mines and utilities both showed strong gains in April.

Factory output has risen 18.3 percent since it hit a low in June 2009, the month the recession ended.


For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

Housing Industry Does A 180

Story first appeared in USA Today.

Townhouses and single-family homes are sprouting on old industrial sites in the heart of Southern California cities. In Florida, developers are coveting foreclosed golf courses in urban centers to put up new subdivisions. Builders in Texas are going after available land even near landfills for residential and retail development.

Why are the giants of the building industry, the creators for decades of massive communities of cookie-cutter homes, cul-de-sacs and McMansions in far-flung suburbs, doing an about-face? Why are they suddenly building smaller neighborhoods in and close to cities on land more likely to be near a train station than a pig farm?

A housing industry slowly shaking off the worst economic conditions in decades is rethinking what type of housing to build and where to build it. It's a response to a new wave of home buyers who have no desire to live in traditional subdivisions far from urban amenities.

The nation's development patterns may be at a historic juncture as builders begin to reverse 60-year-old trends. They're shifting from giant communities on wide-open "greenfields" to compact "infill" housing in already-developed urban settings.

The market slowdown has given builders time to assess sweeping demographic changes that are transforming the way Americans want to live.


For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

State Governments Using Settlement for Other Things

Story first appeared in The New York Times.

Hundreds of millions of dollars meant to provide a little relief to the nation’s struggling homeowners is being diverted to plug state budget gaps.

In a budget proposed this week, California joined more than a dozen states that want to help close gaping shortfalls using money paid by the nation’s biggest banks and earmarked for foreclosure prevention, investigations of financial fraud and blunting the ill effects of the housing crisis. California was awarded more than $400 million from the banks, and the Governor has proposed using the bulk of that sum to pay the state’s debts.

The money was part of a national settlement valued at $25 billion and negotiated with five big banks over abuses in their mortgage and foreclosure processes.

The settlement, reached in February after a year of talks and intervention by the Obama administration, was the second-largest in history involving the states, trailing the tobacco industry settlement, and represented the first large-scale commitment by banks to provide direct aid to borrowers.

As part of the settlement, the banks agreed to pay the states $2.5 billion, money intended to help homeowners and mitigate the effects of the foreclosure surge. But critics complained that this was the only cash the banks were required to pay — the rest comes in the form of “credits” for reducing mortgage debt and other activities. Even that relatively small amount has proved too great a temptation for lawmakers.

Only 27 states have devoted all their funds from the banks to housing programs, according to a report by Enterprise Community Partners, a national affordable housing group. So far about 15 states have said they will use all or most of the money for other purposes.

In Texas, $125 million went straight to the general fund. Missouri will use its $40 million to soften cuts to higher education. Indiana is spending more than half its allotment to pay energy bills for low-income families, while Virginia will use most of its $67 million to help revenue-starved local governments.

Like California, some other states with outsize problems from the housing bust are spending the money for something other than homeowner relief. Georgia, where home prices are still falling, will use its $99 million to lure companies to the state.

The governor of Georgia has decided to use the discretionary money for economic development. He believes that the best way to prevent foreclosures amongst honest homeowners who have experienced hard times is to create jobs here in the state.

The $2.5 billion was intended to be under the control of the state attorneys general, who negotiated the settlement with the five banks — Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and Ally. But there is enough wiggle room in the agreement, as well as in separate terms agreed to by each state, to give legislatures and governors wide latitude. The money can, for example, be counted as a “civil penalty” won by the state, and some leaders have argued that states are entitled to the money because the housing crash decimated tax collections.

The federal housing secretary has been privately urging state officials to spend the money as intended. Other uses fail to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the settlement to bring real, concerted relief to homeowners and the communities in which they live.

Some attorneys general have complied quietly with requests to repurpose the money, while others have protested. The Democratic attorney general of Illinois, said she would oppose any effort to divert the funds. The Republican attorney general of Arizona, said he disagreed with the state’s move to take about half its $97 million, which officials initially said was needed for prisons. But he said he would not oppose the shift because the governor and the Legislature had authority over budgetary matters. The Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest has said it will sue to stop the transferring of the money.

In California, the Attorney General had played hardball in the settlement negotiations, holding out until the very end for a deal guaranteeing that a large share of the benefits would go to California, and then trumpeting her success in a news conference and a flurry of interviews with national news outlets.

While the state is undeniably facing a difficult budget gap, these funds should be used to help Californians stay in their homes.

When asked if the Californian governor could legally appropriate the money, which is supposed to be held in a special fund for the benefit of California homeowners affected by the mortgage/foreclosure crisis, a spokesman for the attorney general declined to comment.

Just last week, the attorney general announced plans to give about half the money to groups that provide housing counseling and legal assistance to homeowners — groups whose budgets have shrunk while demand for their services grows. The other half would be used primarily for investigation of mortgage-related crime.

States using some or all of their money for housing have designated it for a wide variety of programs, like a small fund for low-interest loans to build housing in low-income neighborhoods, in Virginia, and Ohio’s sweeping plan to demolish abandoned property.

In New York, the Attorney General stepped in with $15 million in settlement money for housing counseling and legal assistance when state support ran out last month, and plans to spend the bulk of its $130 million on similar programs. North Dakota will use its tiny allotment, $1.9 million, to provide housing to police officers and emergency responders in its booming oil-field counties, where shelter is scarce.

Using the money for other purposes is shortsighted, housing advocates warn. If you leave homeowners hanging out there to dry, then in the short term maybe you help to meet the budget gap this year, but in the long term the more people we have going through foreclosure, the worse it’s going to be for the economy as a whole.

In some states, redirecting the money could have a racially discriminatory effect, because in some cities black homeowners disproportionately lost their homes. If you dump all of these funds into the general coffers, the African-American homeowners are not going to benefit in any real way because they represent such a small percentage of the larger state.


For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.

15 May 2012

To Buy or Not to Buy...A Home

Story first appeared in The Wall Street Journal.

It's been a scary few years for the housing market. But at some point, the nightmare has to end (please?). Is now the time? Should first-time home buyers consider jumping into the market?

After all, home prices have fallen 34% from their 2006 peak and mortgage rates are hovering at or near record lows.

On one side are those who argue that homes are more affordable than they have been in decades, based on how much monthly income a mortgage consumes and whether owning is less costly than renting.

An uptick in home buying by investors already is under way, they say—an indication that those who wait may miss out on a good buying opportunity.

On the other side, pessimists insist that the housing slump is far from over, and that prices will continue falling—perhaps as much as 20% or more.

Excess inventories, they say, are the problem, and some estimate it could be four years before the market absorbs all of that extra supply.

The chief economist at money-management firm RBC Global Asset Management Inc., says this is a remarkable time to be a first-time home buyer. The president of A. Gary Shilling & Co., an economic consulting firm in Springfield, N.J., says buying now is a terrible idea.

Yes: It's a Rare Opportunity

This could be the best time in a generation to be a first-time home buyer.

Cheery views such as this are out of vogue and easy enough to dismiss as the ravings of a serial optimist. And yet this opinion isn't based on any heroic economic assumptions. To the contrary, it is constructed upon a more curmudgeonly foundation: In my estimation, the stock market probably underestimates Europe's woes, U.S. economic growth may fall short of expectations, and—of greatest relevance—the overall housing market is likely still several years from normality.

Nevertheless, this is still a remarkable time to be a first-time home buyer. Affordability is the best it has been in 30 years, thanks to the combination of a 34% decline in prices since the 2006 peak and a historically low 4% average rate for a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage.

The two affordability metrics that truly matter are how much monthly income a mortgage consumes, and whether this is less costly than renting. On the first count, I calculate that home prices are now an astonishing one-third cheaper than the historical norm. On the second, real-estate website Trulia figures that buying is cheaper than renting in 98 out of America's 100 major markets. That is practically a clean sweep.

Rock-Bottom Rates
Investors get this. While households dither, investors ramped up their home buying by 64% across 2011. They understand that this is the mother of all buyer's markets, and won't last forever. The prospect of making a profit by flipping these properties is still rather distant, so they lay in wait for an eventual rebound and in the meantime make money by renting out their properties for more than the monthly mortgage payment.

Yet most people are sitting on their hands, frozen not by the fundamentals but by psychology. For those able to overcome their phobias, a blazing contrarian opportunity exists.

Here's a dirty little secret about recessions: They aren't bad for everyone. They can even be downright beneficial if played right. Roughly one in 30 Americans is unemployed as a result of the financial crisis. The rest have sidestepped this blow, and what's more have been given the gift of extraordinarily low interest rates.

The long arc of history reveals no other sustained period of real interest rates this low. It is mind-bending that American home buyers can now borrow for 30 years at a cheaper rate than either General Electric Co. or the Australian government. And unlike their counterparts in most other countries, Americans can lock in today's borrowing costs for the full life of their mortgage, enjoying perfect certainty about future payments.

The finances of most households have had a rough go over the past several years. Many were ravaged by financial markets. Others are trapped beneath an illiquid and possibly underwater home.

However, the situation for first-time home buyers is different. They largely skated through the past few years. They weren't yet in the housing market, and so escaped that devastating hit. And with an average age of 30, they hadn't yet accumulated sufficient assets to truly suffer when markets fell.

A significant part of this cohort's savings has been generated in just the past five years, and while markets have been enormously volatile over that period, a monthly savings plan would have generated a 26% return in equities and 22% in bonds. First-time home buyers may not be so hard up for their down payment after all.

Heck of a Deal


But is it wise to take the plunge in this era of economic uncertainty? While the economy remains very fragile, it has become less so since the fall. Still, say the worst happens—you buy a home and then immediately lose your job: The foreclosure backlog provides breathing room, and there is ample evidence that the newly unemployed are regarded preferentially by employers over the poor souls in long-term unemployment purgatory.

Could home prices fall further? Yes they could. The home-inventory overhang is still quite large and credit availability remains poor. Home prices are unlikely to bloom in earnest for quite some time. But inventories are finally shrinking and mortgage availability has at least stabilized, and if you wind up buying a house on sale for one-third off its fair value instead of discounted by 40%, you still got one heck of a deal.

Arguably, the bigger risk is rising interest rates, which could erode affordability and snuff out this buying opportunity.

What if you are presently unemployed, or a grim-faced banker has rejected your mortgage application? Alas, your decision has been made for you. But for viable first-time home buyers—those with a stable job and a preapproved mortgage—this opportunity is ripe for the picking. Investors are already eating your lunch.

No: The Fall Isn't Over

Don't buy your first house now unless you're willing to lose 20% of its market value in the next several years. Maybe more.

It will take a 22% drop to return median single-family house prices to the trend identified by Yale University that stretches back to the 1890s and prevailed until the housing bubble began. (It adjusts for inflation and the tendency of houses to get bigger over time.) And corrections usually overshoot on the downside just as bubbles do on the upside.

The problem is excess inventories. They are the mortal enemy of prices, and experts have calculated an excess of two million housing units, over and above normal working levels of inventories of new and existing homes. That is huge, considering that before the housing market collapsed, about 1.5 million new homes were being built annually, a figure that shrank to 568,000 in February. At current rates of housing starts and household formation, it will take four years to work off the excess inventory, plenty of time for those surplus houses to drag down prices.

Excess inventories, of course, were spawned by the earlier housing boom, which was driven by a host of factors—including low interest rates, almost nonexistent lending standards and government attempts to put even those who couldn't afford chicken coops into four-bedroom houses. But most of all, the housing bubble was driven by the conviction that home prices never fall—they hadn't on a nationwide basis since the 1930s—so any bad purchase would eventually be reversed.

As such, the homeownership rate expanded to 69.3% by late 2004, from the earlier norm of 64%. But now, homeownership has retreated to 66% as foreclosures mount, lending standards stay tight and many worry about their jobs and/or the responsibilities of homeownership. Everyone knows that house prices can and do fall.

Pushing Up Inventories

The optimists will tell you that home inventories have stabilized, but their thinking is flawed.

Our estimate of two million excess homes takes into account those on the market as well as hidden inventories, such as foreclosed homes not yet listed for sale and those withdrawn from the market because owners couldn't stomach the bids they received. A U.S. Census Bureau category that measures such hidden inventories has leapt by one million units since 2006.

Additionally, our inventory estimate doesn't even include future foreclosures, some five million of which are waiting in the wings. The 49% drop in new foreclosures since the second quarter of 2009 is a mirage, and was partly due to the Obama administration pressuring mortgage lenders to try to modify troubled mortgages to keep people in their homes. (They were largely unsuccessful.) Then lenders refrained from foreclosing to avoid even more bad PR during the robo-signing flap that highlighted inadequate foreclosure procedures.

Now that mortgage servicers have reached a $25 billion settlement with Washington and state attorneys general, foreclosures are likely to roar back. That likely will trigger the additional price decline, since the National Association of Realtors says foreclosed houses sell at a 19% discount to other listings, and sizable sales of real estate owned by lenders drag down the entire market. The total peak-to-trough decline in single-family house prices then would be more than 50%.

If those foreclosed out of their abodes move to rentals, they're occupying other housing units, so there is no change in overall inventories. But if they double up or move in with their parents—as statistics show they have been doing—even more excess inventory results.

A Disastrous Investment?

Sure, the always optimistic National Association of Realtors tells you that based on mortgage rates, incomes and house prices, single-family houses have never been more affordable. But according to their index, that was also true in December 2008, and prices have fallen 9.2% since then. Ugh! Home prices may have dropped 34% since the peak in early 2006, but that doesn't make them cheap if prices continue to decline.

Many have realized that an abode and a great investment are no longer combined in a single-family house. Instead of straining to buy a house, young families should rent until their kids are old enough to really need a single-family home.

Yes, apartment rental rates are rising and vacancies are falling, but by past standards, house prices remain high relative to rents. But even if homeownership was cheaper than renting, as some claim, buying a house now would be a disastrous investment if prices fall another 20% or more.

The homeownership dream of an appreciating asset and huge ATM has been replaced by the nightmare of a liability that is expensive to own and falling in value. Act accordingly.


For more Real Estate News, visit the Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For more national and worldwide Business News, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For more local and state of Michigan Business News, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For more Health News, visit the Healthcare and Medical News blog.
For more Electronics News, visit the Electronics America blog.
For more Law News, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For more Advertising News, visit the Advertising, Marketing and Media blog.
For more Environmental News, visit the Environmental Responsibility News blog.
For information on website optimization or for the latest SEO News, visit the SEO Done Right blog.